The Importance of Vindication - Revision history

Admin: /* The Biblical test */

2022-09-30T17:35:21Z

The Biblical test

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:35, 30 September 2022
Line 26:		Line 26:
	In the Old Testament, false prophecy was considered criminal in nature, punishable by death:		In the Old Testament, false prophecy was considered criminal in nature, punishable by death:

	:''But the prophet who presumes to speak a word in my name that I have not commanded him to speak, or who speaks in the name of other gods, that same prophet shall die.~~’ 21 And~~ if you say in your heart, ‘How may we know the word that the LORD has not spoken?’ — when a prophet speaks in the name of the LORD, '''if the word does not come to pass or come true, that is a word that the LORD has not spoken'''; the prophet has spoken it presumptuously. You need not be afraid of him.<ref>The Holy Bible: English Standard Version (Wheaton: Standard Bible Society, 2001), Dt 18:20–22.</ref>		:''But the prophet who presumes to speak a word in my name that I have not commanded him to speak, or who speaks in the name of other gods, that same prophet shall die.’ And if you say in your heart, ‘How may we know the word that the LORD has not spoken?’ — when a prophet speaks in the name of the LORD, '''if the word does not come to pass or come true, that is a word that the LORD has not spoken'''; the prophet has spoken it presumptuously. You need not be afraid of him. (Deut. 18:20-22)<ref>The Holy Bible: English Standard Version (Wheaton: Standard Bible Society, 2001), Dt 18:20–22.</ref>

	In order to know whether to obey the prophetic word, and in order to condemn the false prophet, criteria had to be established by which a distinction between true and false prophets could be made. In some cases, at least, the distinction could be made easily; when a prophet in Israel spoke in the name of other gods, he was not only a false prophet, but he was also guilty of breaking the first commandment, and therefore was deserving of the death penalty. The more difficult case to distinguish would be that in which a prophet actually spoke his own words, but claimed to be speaking the words of God, and therefore—among other crimes—was guilty of gross presumption.		In order to know whether to obey the prophetic word, and in order to condemn the false prophet, criteria had to be established by which a distinction between true and false prophets could be made. In some cases, at least, the distinction could be made easily; when a prophet in Israel spoke in the name of other gods, he was not only a false prophet, but he was also guilty of breaking the first commandment, and therefore was deserving of the death penalty. The more difficult case to distinguish would be that in which a prophet actually spoke his own words, but claimed to be speaking the words of God, and therefore—among other crimes—was guilty of gross presumption.

Admin at 21:48, 23 August 2015

2015-08-23T21:48:55Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:48, 23 August 2015
Line 66:		Line 66:

	{{Bottom of Page}}		{{Bottom of Page}}
			[[Category:The Message]]
			[[Category:William Branham pointing to himself]]
			[[Category:Critical analysis of William Branham‏‎]]
			[[Category:Supernatural vindication‏]]‎

Admin: /* The Biblical test */

2015-08-16T05:41:07Z

The Biblical test

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:41, 16 August 2015
Line 26:		Line 26:
	In the Old Testament, false prophecy was considered criminal in nature, punishable by death:		In the Old Testament, false prophecy was considered criminal in nature, punishable by death:

	:''But the prophet who presumes to speak a word in my name that I have not commanded him to speak, or who speaks in the name of other gods, that same prophet shall die.’ 21 And if you say in your heart, ‘How may we know the word that the LORD has not spoken?~~’— 22 when~~ a prophet speaks in the name of the LORD, if the word does not come to pass or come true, that is a word that the LORD has not spoken; the prophet has spoken it presumptuously. You need not be afraid of him.<ref>The Holy Bible: English Standard Version (Wheaton: Standard Bible Society, 2001), Dt 18:20–22.</ref>		:''But the prophet who presumes to speak a word in my name that I have not commanded him to speak, or who speaks in the name of other gods, that same prophet shall die.’ 21 And if you say in your heart, ‘How may we know the word that the LORD has not spoken?’ — when a prophet speaks in the name of the LORD, '''if the word does not come to pass or come true, that is a word that the LORD has not spoken'''; the prophet has spoken it presumptuously. You need not be afraid of him.<ref>The Holy Bible: English Standard Version (Wheaton: Standard Bible Society, 2001), Dt 18:20–22.</ref>

	In order to know whether to obey the prophetic word, and in order to condemn the false prophet, criteria had to be established by which a distinction between true and false prophets could be made. In some cases, at least, the distinction could be made easily; when a prophet in Israel spoke in the name of other gods, he was not only a false prophet, but he was also guilty of breaking the first commandment, and therefore was deserving of the death penalty. The more difficult case to distinguish would be that in which a prophet actually spoke his own words, but claimed to be speaking the words of God, and therefore—among other crimes—was guilty of gross presumption.		In order to know whether to obey the prophetic word, and in order to condemn the false prophet, criteria had to be established by which a distinction between true and false prophets could be made. In some cases, at least, the distinction could be made easily; when a prophet in Israel spoke in the name of other gods, he was not only a false prophet, but he was also guilty of breaking the first commandment, and therefore was deserving of the death penalty. The more difficult case to distinguish would be that in which a prophet actually spoke his own words, but claimed to be speaking the words of God, and therefore—among other crimes—was guilty of gross presumption.
Line 32:		Line 32:
	The criteria for distinguishing the true words of God are expressed very succinctly in two clauses, (a) The word is not true—the Hebrew rendered literally is “the word is not.” The implication seems to be that the word has no substance, or that what the prophet says simply “is not so.” That is, the word supposedly spoken by God through the prophet was not in accord with the word of God already revealed and it was therefore automatically suspect, (b) … Or does not come to pass—this clause describes prophetic words of a judgmental or predictive nature. The truth of the words would lie in their fulfilment.<ref>Peter C. Craigie, The Book of Deuteronomy, The New International Commentary on the Old Testament (Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1976), 262–263.</ref>		The criteria for distinguishing the true words of God are expressed very succinctly in two clauses, (a) The word is not true—the Hebrew rendered literally is “the word is not.” The implication seems to be that the word has no substance, or that what the prophet says simply “is not so.” That is, the word supposedly spoken by God through the prophet was not in accord with the word of God already revealed and it was therefore automatically suspect, (b) … Or does not come to pass—this clause describes prophetic words of a judgmental or predictive nature. The truth of the words would lie in their fulfilment.<ref>Peter C. Craigie, The Book of Deuteronomy, The New International Commentary on the Old Testament (Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1976), 262–263.</ref>

	1 John 4:1 warns Christians not to believe every spirit, ~~“but~~ test the spirits to see whether they are from God, because many false prophets have gone out into the world.” Similarly, Paul encourages the believers at Thessalonica that even as they welcome prophetic utterances, they must be vigilant in testing all messages, holding fast to what is good and rejecting all that is evil (1 Thess. 5:20–22). In Paul’s letter to young Timothy we hear the most explicit warning to reject presumptuous persons who oppose the truth and are corrupted in their minds (2 Tim. 3:1–8).<ref>Daniel I. Block, The NIV Application Commentary: Deuteronomy, ed. Terry Muck (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2012), 447.</ref>		1 John 4:1 warns Christians not to believe every spirit, “''but test the spirits to see whether they are from God, because many false prophets have gone out into the world''.” Similarly, Paul encourages the believers at Thessalonica that even as they welcome prophetic utterances, they must be vigilant in testing all messages, holding fast to what is good and rejecting all that is evil (1 Thess. 5:20–22). In Paul’s letter to young Timothy we hear the most explicit warning to reject presumptuous persons who oppose the truth and are corrupted in their minds (2 Tim. 3:1–8).<ref>Daniel I. Block, The NIV Application Commentary: Deuteronomy, ed. Terry Muck (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2012), 447.</ref>

	==The course of time==		==The course of time==

	It is true that the credibility of the prophet could be tested only in the course of time. In the case of Samuel, the text states that “YHWH was with him and let none of his words fall to the ground, and all Israel knew that Samuel was established as a prophet of YHWH” (1 Sam 3:20–21). ~~At the same time, one wonders if perhaps a more subtle meaning~~ is ~~also intended in the words~~ that ~~appear here in 18:21–22. Almost half~~ of ~~what~~ we ~~know as the Hebrew Bible is called the Prophets (Former and Latter Prophets). The canonical decision as~~ to ~~which books of the prophets were included in the Hebrew Bible~~ was ~~based on what is taught here. We have a book of the prophet Jeremiah and~~ not a ~~book of the~~ prophet ~~Hananiah~~.<ref>Duane L. Christensen, Deuteronomy 1–21:9, vol. 6A, Word Biblical Commentary (Dallas: Word, Incorporated, 2001), 410.</ref>		It is true that the credibility of the prophet could be tested only in the course of time. In the case of Samuel, the text states that “YHWH was with him and let none of his words fall to the ground, and all Israel knew that Samuel was established as a prophet of YHWH” (1 Sam 3:20–21). It is with that test of time that we are now able to clearly judge whether William Branham was vindicated or not as a true prophet.<ref>Duane L. Christensen, Deuteronomy 1–21:9, vol. 6A, Word Biblical Commentary (Dallas: Word, Incorporated, 2001), 410.</ref>

	==Conduct if a prophet is judged as false==		==Conduct if a prophet is judged as false==

Admin at 05:34, 16 August 2015

2015-08-16T05:34:38Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:34, 16 August 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Top of Page}}		{{Top of Page}}
			[[Image:The-Lord-will-vindicate.jpg\|thumb\|250px\|right]]
	William Branham used the word "vindicate" and its derivations (vindicated, vindicates, vindicating, vindication and vindications) 1773 times in his recorded sermons between 1947 and 1965. His use of the word increased significantly in the latter years of his ministry (1220 times from 1962 - 1965).		William Branham used the word "vindicate" and its derivations (vindicated, vindicates, vindicating, vindication and vindications) 1773 times in his recorded sermons between 1947 and 1965. His use of the word increased significantly in the latter years of his ministry (1220 times from 1962 - 1965).

	This is interesting given that the [[King James Version]] of the Bible '''never uses this word'''.		This is interesting given that the [[The King James Version of the Bible\|King James Version of the Bible]] '''never uses this word''' (although it is used in more modern translations).

	Is vindication really that important?		Is vindication really that important?

Admin: /* Quotes of William Branham */

2015-08-01T19:44:32Z

Quotes of William Branham

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:44, 1 August 2015
Line 63:		Line 63:

	''Isaiah, the prophet, he said, "In my day, '''the Lord vindicated me as His prophet'''. And we know that the Word comes to the prophet. And then, everything that I said, God honored it and made it come to pass. From a little boy, up, everything that was said come to pass. I was vindicated amongst the people as a prophet.<ref>64-0427, A Trial</ref>		''Isaiah, the prophet, he said, "In my day, '''the Lord vindicated me as His prophet'''. And we know that the Word comes to the prophet. And then, everything that I said, God honored it and made it come to pass. From a little boy, up, everything that was said come to pass. I was vindicated amongst the people as a prophet.<ref>64-0427, A Trial</ref>



	{{Bottom of Page}}		{{Bottom of Page}}

Admin at 19:44, 1 August 2015

2015-08-01T19:44:17Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:44, 1 August 2015
Line 32:		Line 32:

	1 John 4:1 warns Christians not to believe every spirit, “but test the spirits to see whether they are from God, because many false prophets have gone out into the world.” Similarly, Paul encourages the believers at Thessalonica that even as they welcome prophetic utterances, they must be vigilant in testing all messages, holding fast to what is good and rejecting all that is evil (1 Thess. 5:20–22). In Paul’s letter to young Timothy we hear the most explicit warning to reject presumptuous persons who oppose the truth and are corrupted in their minds (2 Tim. 3:1–8).<ref>Daniel I. Block, The NIV Application Commentary: Deuteronomy, ed. Terry Muck (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2012), 447.</ref>		1 John 4:1 warns Christians not to believe every spirit, “but test the spirits to see whether they are from God, because many false prophets have gone out into the world.” Similarly, Paul encourages the believers at Thessalonica that even as they welcome prophetic utterances, they must be vigilant in testing all messages, holding fast to what is good and rejecting all that is evil (1 Thess. 5:20–22). In Paul’s letter to young Timothy we hear the most explicit warning to reject presumptuous persons who oppose the truth and are corrupted in their minds (2 Tim. 3:1–8).<ref>Daniel I. Block, The NIV Application Commentary: Deuteronomy, ed. Terry Muck (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2012), 447.</ref>

			==The course of time==

			It is true that the credibility of the prophet could be tested only in the course of time. In the case of Samuel, the text states that “YHWH was with him and let none of his words fall to the ground, and all Israel knew that Samuel was established as a prophet of YHWH” (1 Sam 3:20–21). At the same time, one wonders if perhaps a more subtle meaning is also intended in the words that appear here in 18:21–22. Almost half of what we know as the Hebrew Bible is called the Prophets (Former and Latter Prophets). The canonical decision as to which books of the prophets were included in the Hebrew Bible was based on what is taught here. We have a book of the prophet Jeremiah and not a book of the prophet Hananiah.<ref>Duane L. Christensen, Deuteronomy 1–21:9, vol. 6A, Word Biblical Commentary (Dallas: Word, Incorporated, 2001), 410.</ref>

			==Conduct if a prophet is judged as false==

			The concluding remark concerning the “false prophet,” that “you shall not fear him” (Hebrew - תגור ממנו), means that the people should not “fear” in the sense of attempting to follow him, that is by “walking in his ways” (see the use of the verb, ירא, “to fear,” in Deuteronomy 10:12).<ref>Duane L. Christensen, Deuteronomy 1–21:9, vol. 6A, Word Biblical Commentary (Dallas: Word, Incorporated, 2001), 410.</ref>

			=Was William Branham vindicated as a prophet?=

			The passage of time has not been kind to the ministry of William Branham:

			#He is virtually unknown outside of his followers.
			#There is [[List of Issues with the Message#Was William Branham Honest?\|significant factual evidence that he lied publicly on a repeated basis about many things related to his life and ministry]].
			#With respect to his prophetic ministry, [[List of Issues with the Message#Was William Branham really a prophet?\|numerous of his visions have been proved to have failed and many of his prophecies can be objectively judged as false]].

			As a result, an objective evaluation of William Branham's life and ministry will lead one to conclude that he was not "vindicated" under either Old or New Testament standards.

	=Quotes of William Branham=		=Quotes of William Branham=

Admin: /* The Biblical test */

2015-08-01T19:29:24Z

The Biblical test

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:29, 1 August 2015
Line 27:		Line 27:
	:''But the prophet who presumes to speak a word in my name that I have not commanded him to speak, or who speaks in the name of other gods, that same prophet shall die.’ 21 And if you say in your heart, ‘How may we know the word that the LORD has not spoken?’— 22 when a prophet speaks in the name of the LORD, if the word does not come to pass or come true, that is a word that the LORD has not spoken; the prophet has spoken it presumptuously. You need not be afraid of him.<ref>The Holy Bible: English Standard Version (Wheaton: Standard Bible Society, 2001), Dt 18:20–22.</ref>		:''But the prophet who presumes to speak a word in my name that I have not commanded him to speak, or who speaks in the name of other gods, that same prophet shall die.’ 21 And if you say in your heart, ‘How may we know the word that the LORD has not spoken?’— 22 when a prophet speaks in the name of the LORD, if the word does not come to pass or come true, that is a word that the LORD has not spoken; the prophet has spoken it presumptuously. You need not be afraid of him.<ref>The Holy Bible: English Standard Version (Wheaton: Standard Bible Society, 2001), Dt 18:20–22.</ref>

	in order to know whether to obey the prophetic word, and in order to condemn the false prophet, criteria had to be established by which a distinction between true and false prophets could be made. In some cases, at least, the distinction could be made easily; when a prophet in Israel spoke in the name of other gods, he was not only a false prophet, but he was also guilty of breaking the first commandment, and therefore was deserving of the death penalty. The more difficult case to distinguish would be that in which a prophet actually spoke his own words, but claimed to be speaking the words of God, and therefore—among other crimes—was guilty of gross presumption.		In order to know whether to obey the prophetic word, and in order to condemn the false prophet, criteria had to be established by which a distinction between true and false prophets could be made. In some cases, at least, the distinction could be made easily; when a prophet in Israel spoke in the name of other gods, he was not only a false prophet, but he was also guilty of breaking the first commandment, and therefore was deserving of the death penalty. The more difficult case to distinguish would be that in which a prophet actually spoke his own words, but claimed to be speaking the words of God, and therefore—among other crimes—was guilty of gross presumption.

	The criteria for distinguishing the true words of God are expressed very succinctly in two clauses, (a) The word is not true—the Hebrew rendered literally is “the word is not.” The implication seems to be that the word has no substance, or that what the prophet says simply “is not so.” That is, the word supposedly spoken by God through the prophet was not in accord with the word of God already revealed and it was therefore automatically suspect, (b) … Or does not come to pass—this clause describes prophetic words of a judgmental or predictive nature. The truth of the words would lie in their fulfilment.<ref>Peter C. Craigie, The Book of Deuteronomy, The New International Commentary on the Old Testament (Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1976), 262–263.</ref>		The criteria for distinguishing the true words of God are expressed very succinctly in two clauses, (a) The word is not true—the Hebrew rendered literally is “the word is not.” The implication seems to be that the word has no substance, or that what the prophet says simply “is not so.” That is, the word supposedly spoken by God through the prophet was not in accord with the word of God already revealed and it was therefore automatically suspect, (b) … Or does not come to pass—this clause describes prophetic words of a judgmental or predictive nature. The truth of the words would lie in their fulfilment.<ref>Peter C. Craigie, The Book of Deuteronomy, The New International Commentary on the Old Testament (Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1976), 262–263.</ref>

Admin at 19:29, 1 August 2015

2015-08-01T19:29:10Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:29, 1 August 2015
Line 21:		Line 21:
	1613: an act of vindicating: the state of being vindicated specifically: justification against denial or censure: DEFENSE<ref>Frederick C. Mish, Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary. (Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster, Inc., 2003).</ref>		1613: an act of vindicating: the state of being vindicated specifically: justification against denial or censure: DEFENSE<ref>Frederick C. Mish, Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary. (Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster, Inc., 2003).</ref>

			=The Biblical test=

			In the Old Testament, false prophecy was considered criminal in nature, punishable by death:

			:''But the prophet who presumes to speak a word in my name that I have not commanded him to speak, or who speaks in the name of other gods, that same prophet shall die.’ 21 And if you say in your heart, ‘How may we know the word that the LORD has not spoken?’— 22 when a prophet speaks in the name of the LORD, if the word does not come to pass or come true, that is a word that the LORD has not spoken; the prophet has spoken it presumptuously. You need not be afraid of him.<ref>The Holy Bible: English Standard Version (Wheaton: Standard Bible Society, 2001), Dt 18:20–22.</ref>

			in order to know whether to obey the prophetic word, and in order to condemn the false prophet, criteria had to be established by which a distinction between true and false prophets could be made. In some cases, at least, the distinction could be made easily; when a prophet in Israel spoke in the name of other gods, he was not only a false prophet, but he was also guilty of breaking the first commandment, and therefore was deserving of the death penalty. The more difficult case to distinguish would be that in which a prophet actually spoke his own words, but claimed to be speaking the words of God, and therefore—among other crimes—was guilty of gross presumption.

			The criteria for distinguishing the true words of God are expressed very succinctly in two clauses, (a) The word is not true—the Hebrew rendered literally is “the word is not.” The implication seems to be that the word has no substance, or that what the prophet says simply “is not so.” That is, the word supposedly spoken by God through the prophet was not in accord with the word of God already revealed and it was therefore automatically suspect, (b) … Or does not come to pass—this clause describes prophetic words of a judgmental or predictive nature. The truth of the words would lie in their fulfilment.<ref>Peter C. Craigie, The Book of Deuteronomy, The New International Commentary on the Old Testament (Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1976), 262–263.</ref>

			1 John 4:1 warns Christians not to believe every spirit, “but test the spirits to see whether they are from God, because many false prophets have gone out into the world.” Similarly, Paul encourages the believers at Thessalonica that even as they welcome prophetic utterances, they must be vigilant in testing all messages, holding fast to what is good and rejecting all that is evil (1 Thess. 5:20–22). In Paul’s letter to young Timothy we hear the most explicit warning to reject presumptuous persons who oppose the truth and are corrupted in their minds (2 Tim. 3:1–8).<ref>Daniel I. Block, The NIV Application Commentary: Deuteronomy, ed. Terry Muck (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2012), 447.</ref>

	=Quotes of William Branham=		=Quotes of William Branham=

Admin: /* Quotes of William Branham */

2015-08-01T19:20:54Z

Quotes of William Branham

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:20, 1 August 2015
Line 30:		Line 30:


	''The entire mystery is unfolded. That's the ministry of that angel. See? Be so simple people just drop off the top of it. But yet it'll be perfectly a-vindicated everywhere, just be perfectly normal. See? Everybody that—that wants to see it can see it. See? That's right. But those… Jesus said, as He said when He come, said, "You got eyes and can't see, Isaiah said you did. (See?) And you got ears and you can't hear."<ref>63-0318, The First Seal</ref>		''The entire mystery is unfolded. '''That's the ministry of that angel'''. See? Be so simple people just drop off the top of it. But yet it'll be '''perfectly a-vindicated everywhere''', just be perfectly normal. See? Everybody that—that wants to see it can see it. See? That's right. But those… Jesus said, as He said when He come, said, "You got eyes and can't see, Isaiah said you did. (See?) And you got ears and you can't hear."<ref>63-0318, The First Seal</ref>

Admin at 19:20, 1 August 2015

2015-08-01T19:20:12Z

@@ Line 20: / Line 20: @@
 '''vin•di•ca•tion''' \ˌvin-də-ˈkā-shən\ noun
 : an act of vindicating: the state of being vindicated specifically: justification against denial or censure: DEFENSE<ref>Frederick C. Mish, Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary. (Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster, Inc., 2003).</ref>
 {{Bottom of Page}}