Related changes
Enter a page name to see changes on pages linked to or from that page. (To see members of a category, enter Category:Name of category). Changes to pages on your Watchlist are in bold.
List of abbreviations:
- N
- This edit created a new page (also see list of new pages)
- m
- This is a minor edit
- b
- This edit was performed by a bot
- (±123)
- The page size changed by this number of bytes
17 June 2026
|
|
01:35 | Our Analysis of Appendix B to The Oneness View of Jesus Christ 2 changes history +163 [Admin (2×)] | |||
|
|
01:35 (cur | prev) +27 Admin talk contribs (→The Salvation and Works Question) Tag: Visual edit | ||||
|
|
01:31 (cur | prev) +140 Admin talk contribs Tag: Visual edit | ||||
| 01:05 | David K. Bernard - A Critical Analysis of his Major Publications diffhist +22 Admin talk contribs (→Is Oneness theology false doctrine?) | ||||
15 June 2026
| N 20:00 | Our Analysis of Appendix B to The Oneness View of Jesus Christ diffhist +18,628 Admin talk contribs (Created page with "{{Top of Page}} {{Template:Bernard Jesus}} = Critical Response to Appendix B of ''The Oneness View of Jesus'' = === "An Answer to a Critic": Bernard's Review of Boyd's ''Oneness Pentecostals and the Trinity'' === ----In the closing pages of ''The Oneness View of Jesus'', David Bernard steps outside his usual role as teacher and takes up the pen as a reviewer. His target is Gregory Boyd's 1992 book ''Oneness Pentecostals and the Trinity'', published by Baker Book House....") | ||||
|
|
N 17:34 | An Overview of Bernard's The Oneness of God 2 changes history +15,406 [Admin (2×)] | |||
|
|
17:34 (cur | prev) +2,709 Admin talk contribs (→Why This Constitutes False Doctrine) Tag: Visual edit | ||||
| N |
|
17:33 (cur | prev) +12,697 Admin talk contribs (Created page with "{{Top of Page}} = Overview: ''The Oneness of God'' by David K. Bernard = David K. Bernard's ''The Oneness of God'' is the most thorough and carefully written defense of Oneness Pentecostal theology available. It takes the Bible seriously, defends the full deity of Jesus Christ, and calls readers to a Christ-centered faith. For these reasons it deserves a serious response rather than dismissal. But serious engagement reveals that the book's central claim — that Jesus C...") Tag: Visual edit | |||